Statement by CPS Directors Nadia Abu El-Haj and Brian Boyd

3 June 2020

Monday evening, President Trump announced he would mobilize the U.S. military on domestic soil in order to bring “law and order” to American cities, harkening back to the 1968 campaign for the presidency during which both Richard Nixon and George Wallace invoked the language of law and order to mobilize white citizens against the gains of the Civil Rights movement.  By the close of Trump's address to the nation, that “promise” had been realized in Washington, D.C., a predominantly African-American city (that should rightfully be a state) over which the federal government has jurisdiction.  Not only did military personnel clear the area around the White House with flash bangs and tear gas in order to facilitate a photo-op for the President, by nightfall Blackhawk helicopters flew low, as if to strafe the crowds, to get peaceful demonstrators to disperse.  War-zone tactics have come, squarely, “home.”

War as the framework of contemporary crises is all over American public discourse today: The pandemic is an “invisible enemy,” for some of Chinese extraction; medical workers and other “essential personnel” have come to be referred to as workers “on the front lines.” Demonstrations in protest of the execution of George Floyd are referred to as “urban warfare,” as police departments, the national guard, and now the military police resort to tear gas, pepper spray, flash bangs and rubber bullets.  

This just cannot become the new normal.  War is a poor metaphor—and certainly a disastrous tactic—for addressing the long-term, structural violence of racism in U.S. society, which manifests as much in the disproportionate rates at which African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, and impoverished immigrants are dying in the pandemic as in the seemingly endless summary executions of black citizens.  Whether in the U.S. or in Iraq, in Palestine or in Afghanistan, turning streets into war zones and training military firepower on populations is not the answer. As marches and sit-ins spread across the country, hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens are expressing not just anger and disgust, but more important, they are demonstrating a capacity for solidarity that crosses race and class lines. We can only hope we are witnessing the birth of a radically different political movement and imaginary that will effect real change not just in how the U.S. governs itself, but also in how it enacts its power across the globe.

Professors Nadia Abu El-Haj & Brian Boyd

Co-Directors
Center for Palestine Studies
Columbia University

Nadia Abu El-Haj and Lana Tatour win a 2020-21 Joint Projects Award from IRCPL

Screen Shot 2020-06-03 at 11.00.38 AM.png

The Center congratulates Nadia Abu El-Haj and Lana Tatour on winning a 2020-21 Joint Projects Award from the Institute for Religion, Culture and Public Life at Columbia!

The project, which will lead to a publication, will explore the intertwining of racial and religious difference in the context of Israel-Palestine. By pulling race and religion into a single analytic frame, it seeks to expand the existing conversation on the different practices and projects of racialization that govern Palestinians (citizens of Israel, Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and refugees), the “Other” Jews (Mizrachim and Ethiopian), and African refugees and asylum seekers. The papers will address the historical genealogies and contemporary linkages among race, religion, and settler-nationhood and examine how race politics in Israel-Palestine is tied to religious difference, citizenship status, and political and civil rights.

We extend our congratulations to the other winners of the 2020-21 Joint Projects Award. Read more here

'What Kind of Jew is Shlomo Sand?': an online event with Bruce Robbins

1.png

'What Kind of Jew is Shlomo Sand?':
a Conversation with Bruce Robbins

Friday, June 5, 2020
11:00 AM - 1:00 PM

‘What Kind of Jew is Shlomo Sand?’ a documentary made by Bruce Robbins, Old Dominion Foundation Professor in the Humanities at Columbia University. The film explores the work and mind of Shlomo Sand, Israeli historian and provocateur, who published The Invention of the State of Israel and The Invention of the Jewish People to great controversy.

Our session will focus on a conversation with Robbins about his work as a filmmaker and as a politically active academic, as well as on selections of Sand’s work.

Bruce Robbins is Old Dominion Foundation Professor in the Humanities at Columbia University.

For more information about the event, click here